AIC, American International College Admissions

AIC, American International College Admissions Understudies with passing marks and average grades have a decent possibility of being acknowledged into AICthe school had a 69 percent acknowledgment rate in 2016. Your secondary school transcript will be the most significant bit of your application, and solid evaluations in testing classes will intrigue the confirmations people. State sanctioned grades (the ACT and SAT) are currently discretionary, yet they merit submitting if your scores are on the high finish of the reaches recorded beneath. Letters of suggestion and an individual articulation are likewise optional.â Will You Get In? Compute Your Chances of Getting Inâ with this free device from Cappex Confirmations Data (2016): American International College Acceptance Rate: 69 percentTest Scores 25th/75th PercentileSAT Critical Reading: 380/490SAT Math: 382â /500What these SAT numbers meanACT Composite: 16/22ACT English: -  / - ACT Math: -  / - What these ACT numbers mean American International College Description: American International College is a private, four-year school situated in Springfield, Massachusetts. Counting graduate and college understudies, AIC has around 3,400 understudies, an undergrad understudy/staff proportion of 14 to 1 and an alumni understudy/workforce of 8 to 1. The school offers a wide scope of majors and projects between their School of Business Administration; School of Arts, Education, and Sciences; School of Health Sciences; School of Continuing Education; and graduate projects. Proficient projects are especially well known. AIC is pleased with its innovative advances and has as of late put in another remote system that covers the entire grounds. Understudies are included outside of the study hall, and AIC offers a large group of understudy clubs and associations. The school likewise has a functioning Greek life. AIC contends in the NCAA Division II Northeast-10 Conference in an assortment of sports including men’s and women’s tennis, crosscountry, and lacrosse. The men’s ice hockey group contends independently in the Division I Atlantic Hockey Association. Enlistment (2016): All out Enrollment: 3,377â (1,414 undergraduates)Gender Breakdown: 39â percent male/61 percent female95â percent full-time Costs (2016 - 17): Educational cost and Fees: $33,140Books: $1,200 (why so much?)Room and Board: $13,490Other Expenses: $1,660Total Cost: $49,490 AIC Financial Aid (2015 - 16): Level of New Students Receiving Aid: 100 percentPercentage of New Students Receiving Types of AidGrants: 100 percentLoans: 88 percentAverage Amount of AidGrants: $25,402Loans: $7,719 Scholarly Programs: Most Popular Majors: Accounting, Communication, Criminal Justice, Liberal Studies, Management, Nursing, Psychology, Sport and Recreation ManagementWhat major is directly for you? Sign up to take the free My Careers and Majors Quiz at Cappex. Move, Graduation and Retention Rates: First Year Student Retention (full-time understudies): 69 percentTransfer Out Rate: 43 percent4-Year Graduation Rate: 29 percent6-Year Graduation Rate: 44 percent Intercollegiate Athletic Programs: Mens Sports: Football, Soccer, Lacrosse, Wrestling, Track and Field, Baseball, Basketball, Golf, Ice Hockey, Cross CountryWomens Sports: Field Hockey, Basketball, Track and Field, Cross Country, Softball, Volleyball, Tennis, Soccer, Lacrosse Information Source: National Center for Educational Statistics In the event that You Like American International College, You May Also Like These Schools: Understudies that are searching for a medium sized school in New England with comparative acknowledgment rates (around 70% of candidates conceded every year) ought to likewise look at Endicott College, Becker College, Springfield College, Champlain College, Assumption College, or Fairfield University.

Human Toxic Chemical Hazard And Risk Assessment Essay

Human Toxic Chemical Hazard And Risk Assessment - Essay Example As indicated by a report created by Centers for Disease Control (CDC), in 2008, this concoction poison is the broadly considered and investigated poison, as a result of its toxicological impact on people (Abash, 113). Be that as it may, as per Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), growths delivered mycotoxins are innocuous and accommodating to human body. Moreover, as per Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Aflatoxins are not unsafe if just expended in exact moment amounts. This harmful concoction substance is known to cause intense liver harm and liver malignant growth (Smith, 33). The combined impact of this poisonous synthetic substance is what is known to cause the liver illnesses and harm. A significant worry about this poison is that it is heat stable. In this manner, once delivered on food substances, for example, vegetables, seeds, vegetables and nuts, they remain for all time, since no extraordinary temperatures can crush the poisons. Any warming or freezing has no effe ct on the poisonous compound substance (Huddler, 8). ii. ... Is this an Acute as well as Chronic danger? The synthetic harming brought about by the utilization of food substances attack by this poison is intense. Is this a Systemic or potentially Target Organ Threat? The harming brought about by this poison is both objective organ and deliberate. The inebriation is target organ since it influences the liver, causing its harm and causing other liver ailments, for example, liver cirrhosis, hepatic fibrosis and greasy liver ailment (Abash, 125). The inebriation is likewise efficient since it causes a wide range of malignant growths on the body, influencing diverse body parts. The harming brought about by the poison can likewise cause the blockage of little supply routes, because of blood clumps (Bingham, 591). Generally significant, the disease is methodical since the inebriation causes the glitch of the assimilation framework. This influences the retention of supplements by the body, thusly influencing the security of the mind and in the long ru n prompting trance state and passing. What Are The More Likely (Probable) †Additional, Concurrent Chemical Exposures That May Interact With The Selected Chemical? The Aflatoxins have a likelihood of connecting with the soluble substances of the human DNA, hence causing quality transformation. What Type of Chemical Interactions May Occur With the Additional, Concurrent Toxic Chemicals? The sort of synthetic response liable to happen is intercalation and alkylation of the DNA particles. iii. Hazard evaluation This poisonous compound substance cause damage to shoppers on the occasion that they devour food substances, which has this harmful substance in them. The poison can taint the food substance before gather and during stockpiling (Smith, 27). The

Conferences in 2018 to Get You Pumped Up for PD!

Conferences in 2018 to Get You Pumped Up for PD! (0) It’s a new year, which often means new goals and new resolutions (ones that we will try our best to stick to, am I right?!) Since we’re all such fierce and dedicated educators who constantly try to stay on top of our game, I bet one of your resolutions is to learn new ideas in your field. One way to make it happen? Attend an educational conference. There are tons of conferences on tap for 2018 and here are some of our favorites. For more information, be sure to check the official website for the individual event(s) you’re interested in since details are subject to change. *Please note that this post not an endorsement for any specific event. January 23-26, Orlando, FL:  FETC Future of Education Technology Dubbed the largest K-12 independent edtech conference in the country, this conference has it all for educators, administrators, and IT personnel. There are over 550 workshops and sessions and a vendor hall filled with hands-on demos and exhibits. Plus, it’s in sunny Florida! Go escape the cold for a few days while you learn! February 5-9, Austin, TX:  TCEA Texas Computer Education Association Founded in 1980 with over 17,000 members, TCEA is a nonprofit association with a mission to “advance teaching and learning through the use of technology.” TCEA’s five day conference features 8,000+ attendees (administrators, teachers, IT personnel, librarians, consultants, and specialists), 1,000+ sessions, and 450+ exhibitors. March 5-8, Austin, TX:  SXSW EDU South by Southwest Interested in learning about the most innovative topics in education? Want to know what the future holds? SXSW EDU features speakers, film screenings, policy discussions, and workshops. Attendees can choose a “program track” to focus on a particular interest of study. Program tracks include VR/AR, Equity, Learning Spaces, among others. Check out the competitions to see what entrepreneurs and students have on tap for the future. March 24-26, Boston, MA:  ASCD’s Empower- Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development With over 10,000 attendees (48% of which are superintendents, administrators, or executives) ASCD’s Empower18 wants to empower you to be a leader in the field. This year’s conference boasts high profile speakers including Jill Biden and General Colin L. Powell. April 16-18, San Diego, CA:  ASU + GSV Summit by Arizona State University Global Silicon Valley Yes, a ticket to this conference will set you back $2,000, but attending ASU + GSV’s Summit will allow you to learn from the world’s top leaders in innovation and talent. Over 350 CEOs from the tech industry share their insight and present on innovation in the classroom. The conference’s ultimate goal is to make sure that all students have an equal opportunity to learn and participate in the future. June 21-26, New Orleans, LA:  ALA Annual Conference American Library Association This conference has it all for every type of librarian: public, school, academic, you name it. In addition to engaging sessions that are specifically tailored for library professionals and exhibits that match librarians’ needs, the ALA conference always boasts big name speakers. Last year’s 2017 conference featured Hillary Rodham Clinton, Sarah Jessica Parker, and Ron Chernow. June 24-27, Chicago, IL:  ISTE International Society for Technology in Education While ISTE is known for creating educational technology standards, they’re probably best known for their annual conference, which attracts around 20,000 educators. Professional development sessions, a jam-packed expo hall, and networking with tons of other educators and vendors are just some of the features of this action filled weekend. Bonus points: When you register for the conference, you are provided with a one year membership to ISTE. November 15-18, Houston, TX:  NCTE Annual Convention National Council of Teachers of English The theme for this year’s NCTE Conference is, “Raising Student Voice: Speaking Out for Equity and Justice.” Workshops, sessions, and presentations will revolve around creating change in the classroom to positively affect students and their communities. English teachers of all grade levels attend this conference and there are four different tracks to choose from: The Elementary Experience, The Middle Experience, The Secondary Experience, and The College Experience. Looking for more information about these conferences? Check out each individual website and follow the Twitter hashtags to find up to date news and developments. Cheers to a new year and new learning that will happen in 2018! 2018 is going to be a big year for us and we want to keep you in the know! Subscribe to our newsletters below to receive our updates, articles on citations (i.e. Citing different sources in MLA format, APA citations, etc.), original videos, and more!

10 Radon Facts (Rn or Atomic Number 86)

Radon is a natural radioactive element with the element symbol Rn and atomic number 86. Here are 10 radon facts. Knowing them could even save your life. Fast Facts: Radon Element Name: RadonElement Symbol: RnAtomic Number: 86Element Group: Group 18 (Noble Gas)Period: Period 6Appearance: Colorless Gas Radon is a colorless, odorless, and flavorless gas at ordinary temperature and pressure. Radon is radioactive and decays into other radioactive and toxic elements. Radon occurs in nature as the decay product of uranium, radium, thorium, and other radioactive elements. There are 33 known isotopes of radon. Rn-226 is the most common of these. It is an alpha emitter with a half-life of 1601 years. None of the isotopes of radon are stable.Radon is present in the Earths crust at an abundance of  4 x10-13  milligrams per kilogram. It is always present outdoors and in drinking water from natural sources, but at a low level in open areas. Its mainly a problem in enclosed spaces, such as indoors or in a mine.The US EPA estimates the average indoor radon concentration is 1.3 picocuries per liter (pCi/L). Its estimated approximately 1 in 15 homes in the US has high radon, which is 4.0 pCi/L or higher. High radon levels been found in every state of the United States. Radon comes from the soi l, water, and water supply. Some building materials also release radon, such as concrete, granite countertops, and wall boards. Its a myth that only older homes or ones of a certain design are susceptible to high radon levels, as the concentration depends on many factors. Because it is heavy, the gas does tend to accumulate in low-lying areas. Radon test kits can detect high levels of radon, which can generally be mitigated fairly easily and inexpensively once the threat is known.Radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer overall (after smoking) and the leading cause of lung cancer in non-smokers. Some studies link radon exposure to childhood leukemia. The element emits alpha particles, which are not able to penetrate skin, but can react with cells when the element is inhaled. Because it is monatomic, radon is able to penetrate most materials and disperses readily from its source.Some studies indicate children are at higher risk from radon exposure than adults, probably becaus e they have more rapidly dividing cells, so genetic damage is more serious. Also, children have a higher metabolic rate.The element radon has gone by other names. It was one of the first radioactive elements that was discovered. Fredrich E. Dorn described radon gas in 1900. He called it radium emanation because the gas came from the radium sample he was studying. William Ramsay and Robert Gray first isolated radon in 1908. They named the element niton. In 1923, the name changed to radon, after radium, one of its sources and the element involved in its discovery.Radon is a noble gas, which means it has a stable outer electron shell. For this reason, radon does not readily form chemical compounds. The element is considered chemical inert and monatomic. However, it has been known to react with fluorine to form a fluoride. Radon clathrates are also known. Radon is one of the densest gases and is the heaviest. Radon is 9 times heavier than air.Although gaseous radon is invisible, when th e element is cooled below its freezing point (−96  °F or −71  °C), it emits bright luminescence that changes from yellow to orange-red as the temperature is lowered.There are some practical uses of radon. At one time, the gas was used for radiotherapy cancer treatment. It used to be used in spas, when people thought it might confer medical benefits. The gas is present in some natural spas, such as the hot springs around Hot Springs, Arkansas. Now, radon is mainly used as a radioactive label to study surface chemical reactions and to initiate reactions.While radon is not considered a commercial product, it may be produced by isolating gases off of a radium salt. The gas mixture can then be sparked to combine hydrogen and oxygen, removing them as water. Carbon dioxide is removed by adsorption. Then, radon may be isolated from nitrogen by freezing out the radon. Sources Haynes, William M., ed. (2011). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (92nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. p. 4.122. ISBN 1439855110Kusky, Timothy M. (2003). Geological Hazards: A Sourcebook. Greenwood Press. pp. 236–239. ISBN 9781573564694.

The Segregation Of Public Schools - 1314 Words

In 1982, racial segregation in public schools began over the United States Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Plessy vs. Ferguson’s, â€Å"separate but equal† doctrine, that lasted until the early 1950’s. This precedent legally enabled â€Å"separate† facilities for black students and white students as long as they were â€Å"equal†. During the turn of the 19th century, the term â€Å"Jim Crow† was used to refer to African Americans. This term would later be used as the name of the laws that kept African Americans from public functions and places. It would not be until 1954, that the â€Å"separate but equal† doctrine would be changed for good. In 1950, Reverend Oliver Brown walked his eight-year-old daughter, Linda Carol, to Sumner Elementary School located just seven blocks from her house in Topeka, Kansas. After a discussion Brown had with the principal over the enrollment of his daughter, he was informed that she would not be admitted to the school even though she qualified. The reason she was not admitted to the school was because of the color of her skin, Sumner Elementary only accepted Caucasian children. Reverend Brown was not a man who caused trouble, but he did not want his daughter to have to walk six blocks along railroad tracks in order to catch the bus to a rundown black school (Dudley 8). Brown and his family, along with many other African American families wanted to put an end to school segregation. Thirteen African American families of Topeka rallied together and soughtShow MoreRelatedEnding Public School Segregation: The Brown vs Board of Education Trial940 Words   |  4 PagesThe Beginning Started with Brown vs Board of Education Brown vs Board of Education was a trail to end public school segregation, but the ruling of the trail was not enforced. The case was rooted in Kansas with many different plaintiffs accusing the Board of Education. These plaintiffs bounded together and with the help of the local National Association for the Advancement of Colored People or more commonly known as NAACP, brought the case up to the U.S. District Court. The court ruled in favor ofRead More Segregation: Seperate but Equal967 Words   |  4 PagesLinda Brown’s groundbreaking case pushed America in the right direction. At the heart of the problem was segregation. Segregation is the act of separating a certain person or faction from the main group. In America’s case segregation was practiced on minorities such as African-Americans, Hispanics, and Asians. The full force of segregation was brought down on African-Americans. Segregation was based on shear hatred of blacks by white Americans. The majority of them derived their hatred for African-AmericansRead MoreEssay on Legal Writing Graded Project 2 - Petitioner1280 Words   |  6 Pagesprotection of the laws. In the early 1950s, racial segregation in public schools was normal all across America. Although all the schools were supposed to be equal, most black schools were far inferior in comparison to the all white schools. There was a black third grade girl named Linda Brown from Topeka, Kansas. She had to walk one mile through a railroad switchyard just to get to her school all black school. Yet, there was an all white elementary school only seven blocks away from her home. When herRead MoreRacial Segregation : Segregation And Segregation Essay1142 Words   |  5 PagesRacial Segregation â€Å"Segregation is that which is forced upon an inferior by a superior. Separation is done voluntarily by two equals.† This is an important and powerful quote said by the late Malcolm X. From 1849-1950 segregation took place for a little over a century. Just 4 years after that, in Brown v. Board of Education the supreme court outlawed segregation in public schools. This was the starting point in putting an end to segregation nationwide. However, is segregation really abolished? OrRead MoreThe Relationship Between School Choice And Segregation1044 Words   |  5 PagesSchool choice is a hot topic at the moment in the politics throughout Texas. Many seem to be against it, but see the benefits in the choice. Through this paper I research what the relationship between school choice and segregation is. Through this paper I will explore the isolation of the English language learning students and the challenges they face because of it. The location of schools and that reflects in their students, policies of the schools, and of the programs that they offer. LiteratureRead MoreThe Civil Right Movement Of The United States1712 Words   |  7 Pagesupon the subject of segregation, a separation between whites and blacks during mid-20th century America, and children across the country learn the harsh reality of our nation’s history. Modern culture produces media to recreate these events in movies such as The Help, and Driving Miss Daisy. Although much of the media related segregation with the 1950’s and 1960’s, these decades were only a climax of the protests and civil movements during the time period. Not only segregation, racial inequality hasRead MoreBlack Boys And Girls Holding Hands With Little Brown Vs. Board Of Education1663 Words   |  7 Pagesconfirmed that segregation in schools is now unconstitutional under the law. Dr. King’s dream of â€Å"little black boys and girls holding hands with little white boys and girls† is now a promising reality for children across America. The laws that once den ied colored children and white children from co-learning were no longer allowed to legally stand after May 17, 1954. However, it is currently 2016, approximately sixty-two years after segregation in schools as unconstitutional, yet schools are still significantlyRead MoreSegregation Of Modern American Schools : How It Affects The Students1283 Words   |  6 Pages Segregation in Modern American Schools: How it affects the Students, Why it occurs, and Strides needed to Integrate Hanna Podwin University of North Georgia â€Æ' Segregation in Modern American Schools: How it affects the Students, Why it occurs, and Strides to Integrate Introduction This essay will be on the Segregation in Modern American Schools, how it affects the students, why it occurs, and the strides need to integrate. I picked this topic because I came from a town that was predominantly whiteRead MoreCharter Schools Vs Traditional Public Schools948 Words   |  4 Pages Charter Schools vs Traditional Public Schools Charter schools are an alternative to traditional public schools, but are often viewed as the superior option in comparison to the traditional public school route. By definition, charter schools are a publicly funded and privately ran school under the charter of an educational authority. These types of schools are held to different types of standards than most traditional public schools with freedom to explore unique methods of educating childrenRead MoreRacial, Ethnic And Economic Isolation In Elementary Schools776 Words   |  4 PagesPurpose This research investigates the efficacy of a program designed to reduce racial, ethnic and economic isolation at two public elementary schools in the State of Connecticut. The two schools are Madison Elementary School (MES) in Bridgeport, Connecticut, and Daniels Farm Elementary School (DFES) in Trumbull, Connecticut. During the 2015-16 academic year, 85% of the students at MES were Minority, 18% were classified as English Language Learners, and 100% were eligible for free or reduced price

Hunger in America Unvieled Free Essays

There is a general idea about hunger, which is most of the times associated with the least developed countries in the world. Few people, however, actually see hunger as being a problem in the US. Still, despite the general evolution of the society as a whole, there are a growing number of poor people. We will write a custom essay sample on Hunger in America: Unvieled or any similar topic only for you Order Now Thus, it is important to consider the degree in which hunger represents a major issue for the America’s poor population. This paper argues that, indeed, hunger plays an essential role in the lives of those with limited financial means.The purpose of this paper is to increase awareness on the issue of hunger and what it represents for a large segment of the American society. Moreover, it aims to underline the causes and effects of this phenomenon at the social level. Finally, it seeks to consider different measures that could be taken by all the parties involved in order to improve the condition of the poor and hunger in America. Keywords: Hunger and Food Insecurity. Recent headlines indicate that America has a problem with food. Simply put, Americans eat too much. Obesity is on pace to become the leading preventable cause of death in this country (Reilly, 2002).While this is cause for concern, the reality of a serious health risk linked to an abundant food supply overshadows another problem that America has with food. Hunger affected an estimated 17. 1 million American households in 2008 (USDA, 2008). In the annual USDA survey on food insecurity, the number of Americans found to be food insecure in 2008 rose sharply to 49 million individuals, a 36% increase over the prior year (USDA, 2008). In a country with enough food and money to feed the world twice over, 1-in-8 people struggle to put food on his or her table (Sniffen, 2008). These are startling numbers in a land of plenty.As millions struggle to lose weight, many other millions struggle to find enough to eat. Hunger and its precursor, food insecurity, have a major impact on the lives of many Americans throughout the country. Food insecurity exists â€Å"whenever the availability of nutritionally adequate and safe food or the ability to acquire acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways is limited or uncertain† (Anderson, 1990, p. 1560). Hunger, a narrower and more severe form of deprivation, is defined as â€Å"the painful or uneasy sensation caused by a lack of food† (Anderson, 1990, p. 1560). Hunger and food insecurity is on the increase in the U.S. as families face ultimatums to pay for food or rent, food or medicine. Hunger and food insecurity are two related concepts with many of the same causes, affecting many of the same populations. Hunger and food insecurity exist on a continuum, with hunger being the end result. Food insecurity describes a situation where there is uncertainty in a household’s food supply. This is often due to low income and has an effect on purchasing decisions. Although there might not be any reduction in the amount of food consumed, the stress of not knowing that their food supply is secure can influence decisions. Households typically adopt a series of coping strategies in response to food insecurity† (Hall, 2004). Food quality may be reduced, as may be food variety in response to food insecurity. Food insecurity is the first step toward actual food deprivation. Hunger refers to a state where food intake is actually reduced. The individual doesn’t receive the required amount of calories required for normal functioning. Hunger occurs after food insecurity has already afflicted a household. The difference between hunger and food insecurity is related to where they fall on a continuum of food scarcity in a household.If food intake has not actually been reduced, but the possibility exists that it may be, then the situation is food insecurity. When the instability of food supply has reached the point that food intake is reduced, hunger results. Hunger represents a major issue for America’s poor population. It is an obvious consequence of the lack of sufficient financial resources that would enable them to benefit from a balanced adequate diet. When people look at the facts for themselves, they discover the shocking reality: hunger amidst a sea of plenty is a phenomenon as American as baseball, jazz and apple pie.Today in the United States, because tens of millions of people live below the meager federal poverty line and because tens of millions of others hover just above it, 35. 5 million Americans, including 12. 6 million children, live in a condition described by the government as â€Å"food insecurity† (Feeding America, 2010). Which means their households either suffer from hunger or struggle at the brink of hunger. Primarily because federal anti-hunger safety net programs have worked, American children are no longer dying in significant numbers as an immediate result of famine like onditions, although children did die of malnutrition here as recently as the late 1960s (Hunger and Poverty in the United States, 2007). Still, despite living in a nation with so many luxury homes that the term â€Å"McMansion† has come into popular usage, millions of American adults and children have such little ability to afford food that they do go hungry at different points throughout the year, and are otherwise forced to spend money on food that should have been spend on other necessities like heat, health care or proper child care. Most alarmingly, the problem has only gotten worse in recent years.The 35. 5 million food-insecure Americans encompass a number roughly equal to the population of California (Egendorf, 2006). That figure represents a more than 4 million-person increase since 1999. The number of children who live in such households also increased during that time, rising by more than half a million children (Feeding America, 2010). The number of adults and children who suffered from the most severe lack of food, what the Bush administration now calls â€Å"very low food security† and what used to be called â€Å"hunger,† also increased in that period from 7. 7 million to 11. million people, a 44 percent increase in just seven years (Egendorf, 2007). While once confined to our poor inner cities (such as Watts, Harlem, Southeast D. C. , the Chicago South Side, and the Lower Ninth Ward of New Orleans) and isolated rural areas (such as Appalachia, the Mississippi Delta, Indian reservations and the Texas/Mexico border region), hunger, and the poverty that causes it, has now spread so broadly that it is a significant and increasing problem in suburbs throughout the nation. Meanwhile, just as more people need more food from pantries and soup kitchens, these charities have less to give.Since the government and private funding that they receive is usually fixed, when food prices increase, charities are forced to buy less (Feeding America, 2010). When those fixed amounts from government actually decrease (as they have in recent years), the situation goes from bad to worse. In May 2008, America’s Second Harvest Food Bank Network, the nation’s dominant food bank network (which, in late 2008, changed its name to Feeding America), reported that 100 percent of their member agencies served more clients than in the previous year, with the overall increases estimated to be 15 to 20 percent.Fully 84 percent of food banks were unable to meet the growing demand due to a combination of three factors: increasing number of clients; decreasing government aid; and soaring food prices. The number of â€Å"emergency feeding programs† in America, consisting mostly of food pantries (which generally provide free bags of canned and boxed groceries for people to take home) and soup kitchens (which usually provide hot, prepared food for people to eat on site), has soared past 40,000. As of 2005, a minimum of 24 million Americans depended on food from such agencies (America’s Second Harvest, 2008) .Yet, given that more than 35 million Americans wer e food insecure, this statistic meant that about 11 million, roughly a third of those without enough food, didn’t receive any help from charities. We live in a new gilded age. Inequality of wealth is spiraling to record heights, and the wealthiest are routinely paying as much as $1,500 for a case of champagne, equal to five weeks of full-time work for someone earning the minimum wage. While welfare reform is still moving some families to economic self-sufficiency, families being kicked off the rolls are increasingly ending up on the street.Homelessness is spiking. Poverty is skyrocketing. And the middle class is disappearing. Meanwhile, soaring food prices have made it even more difficult for families to manage. Food costs rose 4 percent in 2007, compared with an average 2. 5 percent annual rise for the 1990-2006 period, according to the U. S. Department of Agriculture (2008). For key staples, the hikes were even worse: milk prices rose 7 percent in 2007, and egg prices rose by a whopping 29 percent. It was even tougher for folks who wanted to eat nutritiously.A study in the Seattle area found that the most nutritious types of foods (fresh vegetables, whole grains, fish and lean meats) experienced a 20 percent price hike, compared to 5 percent for food in general. The USDA predicted that 2008 would be worse still, with an overall food price rise that could reach 5 percent, and with prices for cereal and bakery products projected to increase as much as 8. 5 percent (Simon, 2008). As author Loretta Schwartz-Nobel has chronicled in her 2002 book, Growing Up Empty: The Hunger Epidemic in America, the nation’s hunger problem manifests itself in some truly startling ways.Even our armed forces often don’t pay enough to support the food needs of military families. Schwartz-Nobel describes a charitable food distribution agency aimed solely at the people who live on a Marine base in Virginia and includes this quote from a Marine: â€Å"The way the Marine Corps made it sound, they were going to help take care of us, they made me think we’d have everything we needed. †¦ They never said you’ll get no food allowance for your family. They never said you’ll need food stamps †¦ and you still won’t have enough. Schwatz-Nobel also quoted a Cambodian refugee in the Midwest: â€Å"My children are hungry. Often we are as hungry in America as I was in the (refugee) camps. † America’s Dirty Secret Comes Out of Hiding From 1970 to 2005, the mass media ignored hunger (Gibbs, 2006). But due to the surge of intense (albeit brief) media coverage of poverty in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, and subsequent reporting of food bank shortages and the impact of increasing food prices on the poor, the American public has been slowly waking to the fact that hunger and poverty are serious, growing problems domestically.Plus, more and more Americans suffer from hunger, have friends or relatives struggling with the problem, or volunteer at feeding charities where they see the problem for themselves. Harmful myths about poverty are also starting to be discredited. While Americans have often envisioned people in poverty as lazy, healthy adults who just don’t want to work, 72 percent of the nation’s able-bodied adults living in poverty reported to the Census Bureau in 2006 that they had at least one job, and 88 percent of the households on food stamps contained either a child, an elderly person or a disabled person.It is harder and harder to make the case that the trouble is laziness and irresponsibility (Hunger and Poverty in the United States, 2007). The real trouble is the inability of many working people to support their families on meager salaries and the inability of others to find steady, full-time work. Fundamentally a Political Problem As far as domestic issues go, hunger is a no-brainer. Every human being needs to eat. Hunger is an issue that is universally understandable. And everyone is against hunger in America.Actually, you’d be hard-pressed to find anyone in America who says they’re for hunger. Unlike other major issues such as abortion, gun control and gay marriage, over which the country is bitterly divided based on deeply held values, Americans of all ideologies and religions are remarkably united in their core belief that, in a nation as prosperous as America, it is unacceptable to have people going hungry. Even ultraconservative President Ronald Reagan, after being embarrassed when his op aide Edwin Meese suggested that there was not really hunger in America and that people were going to soup kitchens just so they could get a â€Å"free lunch,† was quickly forced to issue a memo stating his abhorrence of domestic hunger and his intention to end it ( Lieberman, 2003). Since then, Presidents George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, and high-profile members of the Senate and the House, have all given speeches laced with ringing criticism of domestic hunger.Even right-wing think tanks, which often minimize the extent of hunger or say that hunger is the fault of hungry people, claim they want to end any hunger that may exist (Hunger and Poverty in the United States, 2007). If the American political system was put on trial for its failures, hunger would be â€Å"Exhibit A. † Domestic hunger is not a unique problem; it is actually symbolic of our society’s broader problems. The most characteristic features of modern American politics, entrenched ideological divisions, the deceptive use of statistics, the dominance of big money, the passivity and vacuity of the media, the undue influence of interest groups and empty partisan posturing, all work in tandem to prevent us from ending domestic hunger† (Hunger and Poverty in the United States, 2007). If we can’t solve a problem as basic as domestic hunger, over which there is so much theoretical consensus, no wonder we can’t solve any of our more complicated issues such as immigration and the lack of affordable health care.In 1969, reaching a similar conclusion, Sen. George McGovern, D-S. D. , chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs, put it this way: â€Å"Hunger is unique as a public issue because it exerts a special claim on the conscience of the American people. †¦ Somehow, we Americans are able to look past slum housing †¦ and the chronic unemplo yment of our poor. But the knowledge that human beings, especially little children, are suffering from hunger profoundly disturbs the American conscience. To admit the existence of hunger in America is to confess that we have failed in meeting the most sensitive and painful of human needs. To admit the existence of widespread hunger is to cast doubt on the efficacy of our whole system. If we can’t solve the problem of hunger in our society, one wonders if we can resolve any of the great social issues before the nation† (Policy amp; Practice of Public Human Services, 2006). It is not surprising that liberal McGovern would make such a statement, but it is a bit shocking that Republican Nixon,McGovern’s opponent in the 1972 presidential election, made similar statements during his presidency, after having denied that hunger was a serious problem (Policy amp; Practice of Public Human Services, 2006). The reason Nixon finally acknowledge domestic hunger, and ultimately took serious acti on to rescue it, was that he was forced to do so by a combination of grassroots citizen agitation and concentrated national media attention on the issue.In more recent decades, we’ve gone backward, and our modern elected officials deserve most of the blame. While, in the 1970s, the newly instituted federal nutrition safety net that Nixon and McGovern helped create ended starvation conditions and almost eliminated food insecurity altogether, in the early 1980s, Reagan and a compliant Democratic Congress slashed federal nutrition assistance and other antipoverty programs (Policy amp; Practice of Public Human Services, 2006).Reagan also began the multi-decade process of selling the nation on the false notion that the voluntary and uncoordinated private charity could somehow make up for a large-scale downsizing in previously mandatory government assistance (Policy amp; Practice of Public Human Services, 2006). Predictably, hunger again rose. Both Bush administrations and the Newt Gingrich Congress enacted policies that worsened America’s hunger problem (Nightingale, 2003).But when a somewhat more aggressive Democratic congress took over in 2007, Congress slightly raised the minimum wage and added a bit more money for the Special Sup plemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, better known as the WIC food program, and, in 2008, they somewhat increased food stamp benefits (Quan, 2008). Certainly, small advances under Democratic leadership were much better than the consistent setbacks under the Republicans.But even liberal Democratic leaders have proved unlikely to propose bolder efforts because they worry that such a focus might turn off middle-class â€Å"swing voters,† and because big-money donors, who now control the Democratic Party nearly as much as they control the Republican Party, have different priorities (Hunger and Poverty in the United States, 2007). Even when elected officials of both parties do want to substantively address hunger and poverty, they usually get bogged down in all-but-meaningless ideological debates, rhetorical excesses and score-settling partisan antics.Certainly, it’s not just elected officials who are to blame. Many religious denominations that denounce hunger also teach their congregations (consciously or unconsciously) that hunger is an inevitable part of both human history and God’s will (Gibbs, 2006). While it should be ameliorated with charitable acts, they sadly teach, it can’t really be eliminated. Businesses that donate food to charities often oppose increases in the minimum wage and other government policies that would decrease people’s need for such donated food (Hunger and Poverty in the United States, 2006).The news media, funded by ads from businesses and politicians, rarely point out these discrepancies and focus instead on cheerleading for superficial, holiday-time c haritable efforts. But most harmfully, Americans all over the country have been tricked into thinking that these problems can’t be solved and that the best we can hope for is for private charities to make the suffering marginally less severe (Egendorf, 2006). America can end hunger.By implementing a bold new political and policy agenda to empower low-income Americans and achieve fundamental change based upon mainstream values, America can end hunger quickly and cost-effectively (Gibbs, 2006). That achievement would concretely improve tens of millions of lives, and, in the process, provide a blueprint for fixing the broader problems of our entire, bilge-ridden political system. Outside the Taylor Grocery and Restaurant (which serves the world’s best grilled catfish) in Taylor, Miss. , is a sign that says, â€Å"Eat or We Both Starve. Not only is that slogan a good way to sell catfish, it is a great way to sum up why our collective self-interest should compel us to end domestic hunger (Lieberman, 2003). No society in the history of the world has sustained itself in the long run with as much inequality of wealth as exists in America. Growing hunger and poverty, if left unchecked, will eventually threaten the long-term food security, finances and social stability of all Americans, even the ones who are currently middle class or wealthy. How to cite Hunger in America: Unvieled, Papers

Voting in the 21st Century free essay sample

Some political observers have argued that mainstream politicians ignore youth concerns because they know young people are less likely to vote than seniors. In today’s society, modern values consist of things such as technology rather than political life. First, seniors are indeed more likely to vote than youth as they were brought up in a society that respected the right to vote. We will write a custom essay sample on Voting in the 21st Century or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Secondly, politicians direct their campaigns towards seniors because they make up more of the voting population than youth, leading politicians to gravitate towards winning their collective votes. Furthermore, the accessibility of voting booths plays a major role in influencing who actually goes to fill out a ballot. In a modern society such as today’s, the majority of politicians direct their election campaigns towards the large amount number of senior citizens that actively participate in politics compared to the many youth that do not vote. Seniors are indeed more likely to vote than youth as they were brought up in a society that respected the right to vote. The ever famous baby boomers have begun to pass the retirement age of 65 and will soon be surpassing 70 years of age. This generation consists of those born between 1946 and 1964, making them the majority of the senior citizen population today. Baby boomers were brought up in a post WWII era that valued the right to vote. Women valued this right in particular since they had only recently gained that privilege. Also, it was not uncommon for parents to pressure their baby boomer children to vote. Canadian senior citizens today have even mentioned spoken of their parents threatening them if they implied that voting was not their priority. Voting is a tradition, which is passed down among generations, and to baby boomers it is one that was reciprocated repeated for multiple generations, only but to has come to a recent halt. Secondly, Politicians direct their campaigns towards seniors as they make up more of the voting population than youth, leading politicians to gravitate towards winning their collective votes. Strength in numbers turns out to be quite true in the sense of what which age group gets the most attention from political party campaigns. Due to the baby boomer trend, there is an excessively large a population bulge between the ages of 51 and 69. This mass amount large number of individuals can make a huge impact with their votes, since many of them vote the same way not according to party loyalty but based on which party caters specifically to their needs as elderly citizens. In the last federal election the amount number of individuals over the age of 55 that voted was 6.8 million. This can be compared to the 5.8 billion million votes stemming from rest of the population. Senior citizens on their own make up only 14% of Canada’s population but contributed over 50% of all votes cast. These statistics are what cause political parties to aim their campaigns at those over the age of 55 and completely mostly ignore the needs of the youth in today’s society. To clarify, young voters claim they don’t feel recognized by the government and this is quite true; policy has always been made in favor of retired citizens and middle-class families. Youth living on their own, working, travelling, or studying receive little to no benefits from the current political party in power, or any of the parties currently running in the 2015 federal election. In fact, this year in particular, many of the mass amounts of seniors intending to vote are confused as to which party they should select. The Liberal, NDP, and Conservative parties are all targeting senior citizens with their party platforms in hope of winning over that 14%. If governing parties were to organize reorder their values priorities and worry more about the youth in society than pensions and health care, the voter turnout for those aged 18-44 could be higher. Furthermore, the accessibility of voting booths plays a major role in influencing who actually goes to fill out a ballot. Senior citizens that are retired tend to have a lot more time on their hands to be involved in politics, especially in voting. Voting booths in Canada tend to have limited hours and are not open on the weekends, leaving the working class frantic to find time to access one. Retired citizens that receive pensions from the government are far more inclined to make the effort to vote every yearin every election. Although die- hard political fans consider voting an immense privilege, many younger individuals find it difficult to make time in their busy schedules to stop by a recreation centre or public building in which voting is held. These youth consider this process a hassle and will avoid it altogether. Another problem with the accessibility of voting booths is the fact that one must register to vote in advance. This process of registration must be completed any ti me an individual wishes to vote and has moved to a new address. Young people tend to be extremely mobile and relocate multiple times, this can cause feelings of dissatisfaction frustration among youth as it involves another time consuming action that must be completed. Since they feel no recognition anyways, there is no apparent need for and people under 30 to vote as they believe no change will come about regardless of the elected government, there is even more disincentive to vote. Senior citizens on the other hand tend to settle down in one location and stay there. These residents also receive a pension; therefore they andmay have a more disposable source of income than those still in the work force. This barrier in the way of voting accessibility causes a lower voter turnout among youth citizens; however,butnot the elderly. In conclusion, the evolution of the vote from the 1920’s until today is an intense substantial one. When women were declared persons and deemed eligible to vote in federal elections, voting seemed to be all the rage. Every individual in society was excited to have a voice and looked forward to voting in elections. This obsession with the privilege of voting soon dissolved when people began dismissing the chance to vote. Baby boomers that are now entering retirement are more likely to vote than youth due to their morals on voting while being brought up. The vast amount number of senior citizens in Canada increases their likelihood of voting as well. And finally, due to the difficulties of accessing the vote, many young people in the work force cannot make the time or the effort to cast a ballot; while many senior citizens will do so considering they are retired and have a larger amount of free time. It is due to these reasons that government political parties primarily aim the ir campaigns at people over the age of 50; however this ignorance towards youth will soon come to light lead to some interesting outcomes when as the young people of today age and take over the voting scene. In a modern society such as today’s, the majority of politicians direct their electoral campaigns towards the large amount number of senior citizens that actively participate in politics, compared to the many youth that do not vote but . Soon, the youth of today will become the seniors of tomorrow.